EV CHARGER RESILIENCE INDEXAFDC SNAPSHOT · SEP 16, 2026
ChargerGradeKnow your fallback
OPEN METHODOLOGY · VERSION 1.0

How the ChargerGrade score works

A planning score built only from observable station records and geography. It is not measured uptime, a live availability prediction or a promise that a charger will work.

The 100-point formula

Every published multi-port DC fast-charging location is graded with the same seven components. We round the sum to the nearest whole point.

20Current AFDC status

20 when marked available; 0 when temporarily unavailable.

25Port redundancy

3.125 points per DC fast port, capped at eight ports.

1524/7 access

15 when the AFDC access-hours field explicitly lists 24-hour access.

15Nearby fallback sites

3 points per other DC fast site within 10 straight-line miles, capped at five.

10Network diversity

2.5 points per other network represented within 25 miles, capped at four.

10Connector coverage

5 for CCS and 5 for J3400/NACS as listed in the station record.

5Record freshness

5 at ≤45 days; 3 at ≤180; 1 at ≤365; otherwise 0.

Grades

A: 85–100 · B: 70–84 · C: 55–69 · D: 40–54 · F: below 40. These bands describe resilience under our formula, not the percentage of successful charging sessions.

Why we do not publish “uptime”

The federally administered EV-ChART system collects reliability and uptime information for certain funded chargers, but station-level submissions are not released as a public national dataset. Calling our score “uptime” would overstate the evidence.

Distances and alternatives

Nearby sites are identified with a haversine calculation over latitude and longitude. The distance is straight-line distance, not route distance. A nearby record may be inaccessible due to roads, hours, compatibility or real-time conditions.

Publication threshold

Individual reports cover public operational or temporarily unavailable stations with at least two listed DC fast ports. One-port sites still participate in nearby-fallback calculations. Planned sites are excluded.

Reproducibility

Each report exposes component points, station ID, snapshot date and source. The source snapshot is retained so a score can be reconstructed even when AFDC later changes.